Long distance flights use more fuels than cars and pollute the environment. We should discourage non-essential flights instead of limiting the use of the car. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental pollution caused by long-term human activities has already become a headache for governments and people worldwide. Some people suggest that reducing unimportant long distance flights may be an effective way to reduce greenhouse gas emission. While it is a good idea, I believe that other measures like restrictions on private car use should also be applied.
First of all, we have to admit that there is a higher possibility of reducing unimportant flights thanks to the rapid development of instant messaging and mobile networking. Necessary face-to-face business communications in the past are substituted by telecommunications and things are settled online or through telephones. This means business men no longer need to take a long-distant flight to meet their clients, thus decreasing the demand of long distance flights.
However, in economic and cultural respect, it may take a lower price to reduce private car use than to discourage long distance flights. This is because plane is the most convenient and fastest way for long-distant travels and can hardly be replaced. Therefore, there exist risks of a recession in industries which are highly connected to flights, such as tourism. In comparison, the limitation of car use has some remedies - citizens can choose public transits or carpool, which is much more eco-friendly and also convenient.
Based on the arguments above, we can see the advantages of both discouraging non-essential flights and car use. In conclusion, it is too definite to discourage non-essential flights at the expense of limitation on car use. In reality, only by a proper combination of the two measures and applications of other means such as exploiting clean energy and developing high technology which can be applied for renewable resources can we ensure a better environment with a slightest impact on the development in other fields.
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skill needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the course 67
- The maps above show us clearly the planned change in the village of Ryemouth from 1995 to present. 73
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values)Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health.You should write at least 150 words.Allow yours 84
- Some people think that cultural traditions will be destroyed if they are used as money making attractions aimed at tourists Others however believe that is the only way to save these traditions Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 81
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on the society 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore eco-friendly and also convenient. Based on the arguments above, we can see...
^^^
Line 7, column 465, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...can we ensure a better environment with a slightest impact on the development in ...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'as to', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.263157894737 0.247107183377 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.148606811146 0.155533422707 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.12693498452 0.0946595960268 134% => OK
Adverbs: 0.046439628483 0.0501214627716 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0247678018576 0.0437548338989 57% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123839009288 0.122226691241 101% => OK
Participles: 0.046439628483 0.0403226058552 115% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.21704288027 2.80594681477 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0278637770898 0.0326793684256 85% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.077399380805 0.0861772015684 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0247678018576 0.021408717616 116% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00928792569659 0.011925033212 78% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1897.0 1933.35771543 98% => OK
No of words: 298.0 316.048096192 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.36577181208 6.12580529183 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20517956788 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.412751677852 0.374742101984 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.328859060403 0.28420135186 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.268456375839 0.203846283523 132% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.181208053691 0.137316102897 132% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21704288027 2.80594681477 115% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.037074148 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.56093040696 107% => OK
Word variations: 66.4852980649 60.7387585426 109% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0891783567 81% => OK
Sentence length: 22.9230769231 20.7743622355 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7233149823 49.517814964 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.923076923 127.492653851 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7743622355 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 0.814263465372 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 55.8089829633 49.1944974215 113% => OK
Elegance: 1.97183098592 1.69124875643 117% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436044525241 0.332605444948 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.104444600868 0.102741220458 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0802644263362 0.0668466124924 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.544093533291 0.534860350844 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0876368177758 0.148594505496 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174264758579 0.134430193775 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992216926548 0.0742795772207 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.272731514825 0.324371583561 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0979703962017 0.0638462369009 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273268119577 0.228012699653 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955082332447 0.058150111329 164% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.68436873747 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 5.90881763527 68% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.4468937876 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.