It's a common sense that peple are sent to prison after violating the law. However, it's not recognized as the best way to rehabilitate criminals. I hold supporting views upon this matter.
There's no doubt that it has deterrent effect on both potential and habitual offenders as well as a mean of resoling victims their families. But for the bigger picture, criminals' fundamental abilities can be deprived during a long priod of prison. Without these basic skills, people breaking law may find it difficult to seek employment after release as most criminals have lost backing from their families already. Thereby, to lead a life without proper jobs and income becomes a pressing issue for them. And on the side of the state, settlement for overpopulated people who have served sentences can lay burden on both resources distraction and economic advancement.
Supplementary to it, the rate of reoffending have great possibility to increase for most prisons acts only as a role of enjailing law breakers rather than offer confessing and educational lessons. These jails, in a way, fail to achieve rehabilitation of culprits, some of which are just juveniles and first time offenders. Consequetly, these convicts might learn little of their offence and misbehave again.
By comparison, community services are way more effective on reforming criminals. First of all through attending unpaid work as a punishment, offenders can cultivate new life skills such as repairing vehicles, which ensures that they can be hired by appropriate work after imprisonment and also furnishes human labour for auto industry. And with more participation in the programs, there will be fewer actrocities, contributing to extended peace of society.
Overall, a long-term imprisonment can frighten lawbreakers yet community services demonstrate bigger influnce on criminals and the society.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the uk devided into three categories, from 1995 -2002. summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevent. 84
- A longer prison term as a way of punishing those who break the law is not as good as other methods. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 84
- Biotechnology companies all over the world are developing different types of genetically modified (GM) crops. However, not enough is known about the effects of these crops on our health and on environment. Inferring with nature in this way should be prohi 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
Its a common sense that peple are sent to p...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: There's
...old supporting views upon this matter. Theres no doubt that it has deterrent effect o...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 620, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...served sentences can lay burden on both resources distraction and economic advancement. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to extended peace of society. Overall, a long-term imprisonment can frighten la...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, well, no doubt, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41924398625 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00934409985 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670103092784 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7605390185 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0934939872091 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297633501748 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248731104327 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0494481162613 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173833232324 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.