As machines have become more sophisticated, more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically. Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects?
Physical jobs, which include a lot of strength, are now becoming less demanding and can be automatically processed by cutting-edge machines. This trend is still causing controversies over its impact on the industrialized industry, but I support the idea that its advantages outweigh its hurdle.
On the one hand, this trend has numerous effects on improving the quality of jobs and working conditions. In the past few years, workers used to have unsafe working conditions and lack crucial gadgets for work. However, in today’s time, due to the enhancement of machines, jobs are becoming less demanding and with the help of modern technological machines, the production is becoming higher. Thus, all workers have to do today is to supervise machines doing the work.. Moreover, working conditions are much safer than in the past, and help prevent unpredictable accidents. In a fast-changing world, modern machines support workers with their workplace and the difficulties their demanding jobs cause; therefore, improve their living standards.
On the other hand, it is argued that machines could lessen the number of jobs available for the unemployed. Thus, some people believe that if machines are responsible for 80% of our work duty in a machine, workers are likely to become jobless. Although machines make hard physical jobs less tiring to workers, they are likely to increase the percentage of unemployment. From different perspectives, this trend’s drawback is not as challenging as we assume if people utilize machines effectively.
In conclusion, I agree that this trend’s positive contributions outweigh its disadvantage.
- The bar chart on the next page shows the results of a survey of the reading habits of male and female first year university students at a university in the UK The pie chart show the amount of time male and female students spend on various activities 89
- The diagram below describes the nitrogen cycle 61
- In many countries children participate in some paid work in their spare time Some people think that this is wrong but others believe that such work will extend children s knowledge and increase their sense of responsibility What is your opinion 73
- As machines have become more sophisticated more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 73
- Some people say the fashion industry has a bad effect on people s lives Do you agree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...safe working conditions and lack crucial gadgets for work. However, in today’s ti...
^^
Line 2, column 468, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... is to supervise machines doing the work.. Moreover, working conditions are much s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47826086957 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07914524914 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600790513834 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8699350142 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.615384615 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264382080344 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902344699244 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470953778349 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145680835468 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018930555027 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.