As machines have become more sophisticated, more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically. Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects?
Physical jobs, which include a lot of strength, are now becoming less demanding and can be automatically processed by cutting-edge machines. This trend is still causing controversy over its impact on the industrialized industry, but I support the idea that it has more advantages than drawbacks.
On the one hand, this trend has evolutionary effects on the quality of jobs and working conditions today. In the past few years, workers used to have unsafe working conditions and lack crucial gadgets for work. However, in today’s time, due to the enhancement of machines, jobs are becoming less demanding and with the help of modern technological machines, the production is becoming higher. Thus, all workers have to do today is to supervise machines doing the work.. Moreover, working conditions are much safer than in the past, and help prevent unpredictable accidents. In a fast-changing world, modern machines support workers with their workplace and the difficulties their demanding jobs cause; therefore, improve their living standards.
On the other hand, it is argued that machines could lessen the number of jobs available for the unemployed. Thus, some people believe that if machines are responsible for 80% of our work duty in a machine, workers are likely to become jobless. Although machines make hard physical jobs less tiring to workers, they are likely to increase the percentage of unemployment. On the whole, this trend’s drawback is not as challenging as we assume.
In conclusion, I agree that this trend’s positive contributions outweigh its disadvantage.
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows how soft cheese is made 73
- Parents are putting a lot of pressure on their children to succeed Is it a positive or negative development 61
- The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...safe working conditions and lack crucial gadgets for work. However, in today’s ti...
^^
Line 2, column 468, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... is to supervise machines doing the work.. Moreover, working conditions are much s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, in conclusion, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36947791165 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03281728393 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59437751004 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9417632089 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.846153846 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308728567211 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949634436262 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472535353978 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160491290165 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202515528612 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.