Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can
replace their functions.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often argue that innovative gadgets like computers can substitute books and there by spending money for book wagons would be unnecessary to the core. Computer application have strong memory and prevalent storage capacity. Nonetheless, in this essay I strongly disagree with this statement because, reading in books and maintaining antique reading stuffs would be an indispensable habit and adore to many readers. computer programs have the limit to enhance such human determinants.
Public book readings and use of libraries has become obsolete with the introduce of electronic devices.
Communal libraries get rid of stress and loneliness along with informative talking to each other. Reading would be a prevalent habit and that might get new ideas or familiarise other authors to co-readers. Furthermore, make use of archaic books would give inventive experience by smell, traditional letters, and book bindings as well. For instance, pristine cover of a book from 1970's I got from our local library last year. Library expenditure would occupy to search old books and book stuffs to save for out coming generations.
Computer applications have the limitation as compared to book wagon. Many devices would help to store old books and software to keep for long time basis. Notwithstanding, any virus or hard disk damage would vanish out all the details may be permanently. Moreover, Computer has been an indispensable devices in our daily life and that may leads to people introvert and infonesia.
In conclusion, computers would overlap books abilities, but removal of money for the library purposes would make detrimental effect on to the individual and community.
- The chart and graph below give information about sales and share prices for Coca-Cola.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. » You should write at least 150 words. 73
- Some believe it is important for cities and towns to invest heavily in building large outdoor public spaces To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 67
- The diagram details the process of making wool Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries Do you agree or disagree 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I strongly disagree with this statement because, reading in books and maintainin...
^^
Line 2, column 422, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Computer
...sable habit and adore to many readers. computer programs have the limit to enhance suc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aders. computer programs have the limit to enhance such human determinants. P...
^^
Line 4, column 68, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e of libraries has become obsolete with the introduce of electronic devices. Communal librar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...might get new ideas or familiarise other authors to co-readers. Furthermore, make...
^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'device'?
Suggestion: device
...ver, Computer has been an indispensable devices in our daily life and that may leads to...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, well, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4144486692 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91418016567 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619771863118 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4153764471 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.091211799641 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358057447082 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266319433519 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0644509819398 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252715263964 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.