Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
Nowaday, Traditional libraries have been altered by development of technology, therefore some people think that the authorities should use budget for others instead of maintaining them.. In my opinion, public libraries have crucial functions that new techniques can not perform and should be considered to maintained for public access.
To the certain extend, computer technology has developed in leaps and bounds in every-inch and helped people approach new information conveniently and regularly, which physical libraries could not adapt and serve for readers. Moreover,with supporting of Internet, viewer can be well-informed of fast pace of life with just 1 click at the button, 24/7. Besides, the maintaining cost and effort to repair old books is extremely expensive, while in some countries, the budget deficiency is serious problem. It leads to some traditional libraries in developing countries have to charge fee on reader in special action but do not serve readers on weekends.
However, some people argue that rare books and documents in library should be preserved as a part of history and they have a high cultural value. This argument could be true to some extent. With the rapid spead of information on smart product and Internet, official documents are storaged in library, conveying to later generations and keeping a significant role. Moreover, it is high bebeficial, given decreasing number of sources of noises around readers and help them feeling comfortable in quite place thanks to asmosphere of physical libraries.
Taking all above mentioned facts in to account, although computers and new techniques could help viewer access information conveniently and regularly, but maintaining libraries is necessary and not waste of money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...t for others instead of maintaining them.. In my opinion, public libraries have cr...
^^
Line 2, column 16, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...ined for public access. To the certain extend, computer technology has developed in l...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , with
...ot adapt and serve for readers. Moreover,with supporting of Internet, viewer can be w...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...some traditional libraries in developing countries have to charge fee on reader i...
^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to feel' or 'feel'.
Suggestion: to feel; feel
... of noises around readers and help them feeling comfortable in quite place thanks to as...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is necessary and not waste of money.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52592592593 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96989005076 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614814814815 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6929481288 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.636363636 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15819469399 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590536218654 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382106548866 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992502792529 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027541340526 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.