Many children nowadays are spending more and more time inside rather than outside Is this a positive or negative trend Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your knowledge or experience

Essay topics:

Many children nowadays are spending more and more time inside rather than outside. Is this a positive or negative trend? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your knowledge or experience.

In the current vogue, the majority of children prefer to stay indoors instead of going outdoor. This is a negative development as they are less likely to be sociable and healthy in the future.

The major downside of spending more time at home is less sociable which means children are more likely to become introverted and isolated as they would forget interpersonal skills that are required to interact with society. This may be because no one can teach these skills at home, which only can be grabbed by meeting with people. For example, oxford university has proved children who spend more time inside are not able to communicate with other members of society and feel hesitant. Therefore, this example proves that spending more time at home has affected their life negatively.

The second concern is that this trend also leads to an unhealthy lifestyle. This is because children may not have more options to play at home, ultimately, they will tend to spend more time on mobile phones or computers by sitting in one place. This would result in obesity. For example, in London most children who stayed at home rather than going outside become overweighted. Otherwise, if they spend more time outside playing with other friends, they may never face such an issue. Thus, this trend leads to negative development.

In conclusion, the majority of children have to suffer from heath hassles and they will tend to be less sociable if they spend more time at home because there are limited options for them to do.

Please evaluate mam

Votes
Average: 6.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-06-11 nistiqamah 84 view
2020-12-26 Guri kaur gill 63 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bed by meeting with people. For example, oxford university has proved children wh...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43121648758 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534615384615 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2336778265 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9285714286 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274832292886 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101977441042 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598991934462 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166844891718 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716523581529 0.056905535591 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.