Safety in an elusive privilege nowadays because of the rise of criminal activities. For this reason, many metropolitan have employed the use of surveillance videos for the main purpose of reducing the crime rate. However, many believe that in installing CCTVs, the people's individual privacy are being encroached. I am led to argue that the setback of this so-called security system is far greater than its advantages.
On the one hand, having video surveillance makes a person at ease because it is in fact true that criminals will think twice before committing unlawful acts. Because of this, people will not fear roaming around their cities. Likewise, having CCTVs does deter the occurrence of petty crimes such as loitering, the reason is that small-time and less experienced criminals are easily caught by law enforces with the aid of their video evidence. These benefits do possess reasonable cases for adapting the use of video recordings.
On the other hand, despite the sound advantage of recording the daily activities of public places, it is far more reasonable to detest them. For one, they do impose humiliation on the recorded person's part. In specific, since the video recording captures all the daily activities of public places such as walking, driving, talking, embarrassing acts such as making faces, and some nose-picking here and there are also being captured. These actions do not pose any significant threat at all, but instead they humiliate the subjects, yet they are kept and archived. On top of that, these clippings might even reach video streaming sites where other people could make fun of the innocent activities which is definitely going overboard one persons' personal space. Furthermore, heinous crimes are still committed despite the presence of video recorders in alleys and streets. The fact is that bigger criminals are not terrified by surveillance cameras as shown by massive bombings and terrorist attacks still occurring in huge cities where presence of high-end video recorders are evident. Therefore, the expressed purpose of installing cameras to relinquish dreaded and unlawful acts with disregard to the effect of invasion of privacy does not merit more benefits.
In summary, the use of recording devices to survey people;s daily activities especially in public places is not beneficial when faced with the dilemma of personal freedom, The rationale being that they record activities that are not threatening yet embarrassing to the video subjects. Another reason is that larger criminals are not threatened by video recordings devices and more serious crimes are not prevented by video recording all together.
- Happiness is considered very important in life. Why is it difficult to define? What factors are important in achieving happiness? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own experiences. 84
- In many cities, security measures, such as the use of video cameras in public places,are being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom.Do the benefits of increased security outweigh t 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 733, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one person', 'a person', or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: one person; a person; persons
...ies which is definitely going overboard one persons personal space. Furthermore, heinous cr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, likewise, so, still, therefore, as to, in fact, in summary, such as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2246.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33491686461 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72032583458 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553444180523 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1269490329 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.777777778 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3888888889 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20850425334 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644636349831 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04365165263 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125602042775 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261756899914 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.