In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?
In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards living in flats among citizens in urban cities.
Although this trend is not without advantages, the downsides will justify these.
On the one hand, it is evident that living in apartments offers a myriad of benefits among which the primary one is the affordable price for accommodation. Due to the baby boom in the metropolis, land is becoming increasingly exorbitant. Therefore, an apartment which crams a vast number of residents into a small place makes the cost to live here reasonable, thus, enables low-income people to live near both the city’s hub and their workplaces. Additionally, thanks to security guards and devices, it is obvious that blocks bestow dwellers with safeguarding. This is because they can monitor what is happening in the vicinity through CCTV or be protected from thieves by guards.
However, I believe that the negative implications of this trend far eclipse its positive impacts mentioned above. Firstly, residents will face a host of adversities while evacuating from fire or natural disasters. For example, if a fire broke out, they would easily be stuck on the top floors. Secondly, because of the cramped environment of the apartment, it will cause infectious diseases to spread more quickly. Furthermore, since an apartment may lack space, it provides no space for exercise. Thereby, creating a major health risk.
In conclusion, given that large blocks of flats furnish city dwellers with a cheaper living option, they bring a number of drawbacks in terms of not only lower quality accommodation with confined space but also health risks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-01 | surajgupta1993 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-13 | vedant.vp2010@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-08 | baljit12 | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-23 | layla23012003 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Kamal1993 | 78 | view |
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private company To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justifiable They believe there are more beneficial ways of spending this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In many cities today most people live in large apartment blocks Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages 84
- Some people say that the best way to improve road safety would be to increase minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- More and more people today want to buy goods e g clothes and smartphones with well known brand names Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24242424242 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82707743975 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674242424242 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0243587934 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167431000504 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409640851119 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400157494657 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776518786981 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443067622059 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.