More and more people today want to buy goods, e.g. clothes and smartphones, with well-known brand names. Why is this? Is this a positive or negative development?
In recent years, the proclivity of purchasing merchandise with luxurious brand is gaining more traction. Admittedly, there are some causes behind this consuming trend and although there are some positive implications of this, I believe that the downsides of it are more considerable.
Firstly, the most significant factor that make consumers prefer buying popular brands’ goods is their quality and reliable warranty systems. Since people now have easy access to various review websites or social media platform, any negative feedback can be spread easily. Therefore, these well-known conglomerates have to ensure the quality of their products so that they will not ruin their reputation. Secondly, the ubiquity of advertisements may lead to the formation of false notion in young adults that only by obtaining the mentioned products can they boast their wealth. To illustrate, Apple illustrates the superior feature of their recently released airpods in comparison with other ordinary earphones with an aim to manipulate customers into thinking that having this device will enable them to become more trendy.
When it comes to the drawbacks of this trend, the fact that companies owning famous brands can have a monopoly on the market is the most worth-mentioning one. This is because when the public is only in favor of products made by these corporations, they will not have competitors and thus, leading to the fact that they will have no motivation to make progression. Furthermore, this also reduces the chances to succeed for start-up companies since they are not able to compete with those giant conglomerates. Moreover, it is a norm that these companies’ products are exorbitant and consequently, if people want to purchase them while they are not so affluent, it can cause some unpayable debts.
In conclusion, the brisk sell of famous products may be attributed to their quality and the frequency of commercials nowadays. However, I would believe that this would bring some adverse effect on the economy and also be disadvantageous to consumers in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-19 | layla23012003 | 84 | view |
- For many employers formal academic qualifications are becoming more important than experience Why is that Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines Should parents be made by law immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children 89
- Cycling is the healthier and more environmentally friendly form of transportation Nevertheless cycling is getting less popular What are the reasons for this What can be done to make cycling more popular 84
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 84
- In many cities today most people live in large apartment blocks Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntageous to consumers in the long run.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31515151515 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93114117937 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578787878788 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.8126554005 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.923076923 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215881230673 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729220561833 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530634983986 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133028096451 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753776722569 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.