Many countries are spending a huge amount of money on supporting their competitors to take part in some worldwide sports competition. Others argue that it would be better if these countries can spend the money on children to take part in sports. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, a great deal of interest is being invested by the government in nourishing the competitors in order to gain reputation in world sports battle. Nevertheless, many people hold the view that it is crucial to keep the expenditure on supporting children’s practice in sports. From my perspective, whereas it is momentous to spend money on big games, money should also be allocated for children’s opportunities to play sports.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that the amount of money flown into national teams is an indispensable part of the development of a national sports background. When a well-prepared team joins and gains high prizes from the international competitions, it will be a pleasure for not only the players themselves but also for the whole nation. Furthermore, world-class games such as the Olympics and World Cup present as the ultimate goal which could evoke passion inside each individual who is likely to involve in sports. More importantly, players who achieve fame from various worldwide contests, Lionel Messi or Cristiana Ronaldo, for instance, can be iconic models for youths who are passionate about playing sports.
On the other hand, notwithstanding the aforementioned benefits, youngsters should be cared for when considering the growth of sports in a country. To begin with, motivating juveniles to play sports could help them practice a wonderful habit that could improve and strengthen their body. Some researchers elucidated that if a person could spend thirty minutes working out, they would likely reduce the risks of hypertension disease. Additionally, if adolescents are allowed to enroll in sports, some young gifted individuals could be discovered soon. Thus, they would be introduced to some advanced training methods for their further leaps and future pathways.
To conclude, it is an advantageous thing when a massive amount of cash is being put on sport especially in national sports teams. However, paying more attention to youth’s development in sports should not be neglected as the young generation is a bright future that represents the country’s reputation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, whereas, for instance, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38208955224 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09414756672 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.6733765465 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.785714286 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2529756449 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808145543372 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444713413288 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148486744816 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422446601491 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.