Recently, youngsters are using more time to play digital devices than having outdoor activities such as sports. From my perspective, it definitely has negative impacts on children’s development. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons why this case is happening and delineate why I believe that this brings drawbacks to juvenile improvement.
There are several causes to elucidate why more and more adolescents lean towards using electronic devices to play. Apparently, computer games have plenty of vibrant visual effects which is attracting children to play. Because of the young age, the youth prefer to approach anything that has lively images or videos so that digital devices can easily become intriguing to youngsters. Furthermore, teenagers nowadays seem to be more inactivated than in the past. Thus, sports are clearly not the optimal option that they will choose when they have spare time
Although digital games may be very entertaining and intriguing to teens, I still believe that it brings weaknesses to children’s amelioration. Doubtlessly, online games make adolescents become lazier which affects their health. Due to the low rate of exercise, children can be brought diseases to their health such as obesity or diabetes. Additionally, gluing eyes on computer games can affect the communication skills of juveniles. On account of less interaction with people, teenagers will be lack communication skills as they do not interact with individuals in reality which will affect their improvement at a young age.
To sum up, youngsters are taking more time to use digital devices than doing sports in recent years. This can be explained by the visual effects of online games and the laziness of children nowadays. Therefore, this certainly brings disadvantages to teenager’s development as it affects their health and interaction skills.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, furthermore, may, so, still, therefore, thus, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47058823529 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9567226022 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570934256055 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2575291774 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334748880713 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105553676121 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593188682189 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201777654078 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537578300044 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.