In many countries, the costs of living are rising. What are the effects of this on individuals and society? Suggest solutions to this problem.
It is convinced that the increasing charges of living have some impacts for many people and their social environment. In this essay I would examine what the influences of this matter and how to deal with it.
In the one hand, there are some impacts of increasing life charges for person and social living. Firstly, many people reduce spending on their hobbies that are not as usual. It is springed by a lot of money is diverted to primary needs rather than secondary necessity. For example, people who like to collect motorcycles and constantly buy it four times in six months would change their habit because the money must be used to buy household needs such as rice and oil which have higher prices than normal. However, this situation forced some people to sacrifice their hobbies even for a few. In this way, rising life cost create many people are required to choose hobbies or daily needs. Secondly, bit more people decrease their time to hangout with friends to save their money. This condition occurs because most of their income used for their daily necessity. For instance, an office worker who frequently celebrates the weekend with friends becomes less active and join it only once a month, this atmosphere caused by her income is in line with the basic expenses in a month. Inevitably, some social life is disturbed since highly cost living.
Nevertheless, to wipe this problem, first of all, many people should record their expenditure so that they have no spend money in vain and build selective habits. For model, few person who regularly take notes to their outlay as well as a book purchase or anything would have more valuable expenses and more discipline in spending money. This behaviour is designed to mitigate the impact of cost living highly. In addition, the government should provide subsidies to their citizen especially for underprivileged people. For the exemplification, when the price of rice is increasing, people who registered in lower class only have to pay half of the price. Therefore, it would rescue lot of residents from the high cost of living that make it miserable.
On the whole, there are many effects caused by the price of high living that every single person should avoid through multiple exit ways such as create note for every expense and the government policy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-08 | Wulan | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-18 | Killua | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | Thuc Linh Dinh | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-18 | Tam angela | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-18 | Tam angela | 73 | view |
- The graph show changes in spending habit of people in UK between 1971 and 2001 73
- The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city 73
- The chart and table show the exports earnings and percentage change in values in 2015 and 2016 89
- Water Use in Gulf Countries 2000 78
- Airport visitors 2007 2012 Millions of travelers per year 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of this matter and how to deal with it. In the one hand, there are some impacts ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun person seems to be countable; consider using: 'few people', 'few persons'.
Suggestion: few people; few persons
... and build selective habits. For model, few person who regularly take notes to their outla...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, first of all, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91326530612 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48746859277 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4279744727 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.368421053 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6315789474 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.89473684211 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181880271669 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680134785434 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726531558304 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131331798225 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467691678094 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.