In many countries nowadays, people still live with their parents after marriage. Do you think this trend has more advantages or disadvantages?
Recently, there has been a tendency wherein people remain residing with their parents after getting married. In my view, although this lifestyle is of benefit to family relationship, such advantages might be outshined by the limitations.
In today’s hectic society, living with parents after marriage is considered, to a great extent, laudable as it substantially contributes to fostering family relationships. A number of surveys carried out has revealed that since most of people’s time is spent for work, they are likely to devote less time for family, hence a gap in kinship and a lack of care towards parents. By leading an extended family, people can take care of their relatives, share domestic happiness and provide mutual help once facing hardships.
Despite the aforementioned strength, it is undeniable that there exist several drawbacks regarding this issue. Firstly, there is a high possibility that the distinctions between lifestyles of the previous generation and that of the younger one would produce a clash, leading to arguments among family members. For example, people from the former generation tend to obtain conservative thoughts whereas the youth are likely to open to modern ones, thereby generating conflicts in lifestyles with stress as well as inconvenience ensuing as a result. Moreover, settling down with parents can make people become reliant on their senior housemates. Not virtually all people are truly spending an independent life even after marriage as they can seek financial support from their parents whenever they need. This might result in people’s not putting much effort into work which may lead them to indulge in society’s vices, such as gambling.
For the foregoing discussions, I would reiterate that residing with parents after marriage, albeit beneficial in improving family relationships, still possesses several demerits which can cause negative impacts on people’s life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-03 | BSanQ | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | thecarromato | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | giang7798 | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | mifas meleraroth | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, well, whereas, for example, such as, as a result, as well as, in my view, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60606060606 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00018704991 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639730639731 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8314797972 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.75 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3333333333 7.06120827912 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226022661349 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834398734524 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571983593218 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14680275325 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288863018529 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.