In many countries people do not do enough to recycle their used materials (glass, paper, metal).What do you think are the reasons for this? What do you think can be done to solve this problem?
The negligent behavior of people towards their carbon footprint, leading to the recyclable wastes, including glass, paper and metals, going to the landfills is a burning issue at present. There are multiple causes leading to these acts, the major being lack of proper knowledge, which can be solved through the collaborative efforts of both the people as well as the government. The impending write-ups explore the reasons and suggest possible solutions for such problems.
Having no prior knowledge for the distinction of the recyclable materials from the garbage among the people is a leading cause for the lesser waste being recycled. Studies have shown, more than 80% of the general population in Nepal do not have sufficient knowledge on distinction of the materials that can be recycled, making segregation of the waste being done inaccurately. Moreover, those who have the knowledge to distinguish these materials are still negligent about the implications due to a lack of proper authority imposing rules to promote recycling.
In order to solve these problems both the local authority and the government can equally play their roles. Local authorities can raise awareness among the people about the positive impacts of recycling as well as conduct training for teaching proper segregation of recyclable waste. Meanwhile, imposing stricter rules against improper disposal of waste by the government can help promote the behavior, making people abide by their civic duty. The sharp incline in the amount of wastes recycled in Ghana after imposing a fine system perfectly exemplifies how healthy behavior can be fostered through by the regulations.
All in all, the reasons behind the problem of less waste turning up to the recycling facilities are due lack of awareness for some, while irresponsible behavior despite the knowledge for others. Thus, spreading awareness locally, at the meantime administering rigid policies by the government can help solve the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-15 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | Dipesh1234 | 80 | view |
- Many people in poor countries die from diseases that are curable because they cannot afford the medication required Do you believe that drug companies should make their products available at reduced prices in these countries 56
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job On the other hand ther people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 80
- The best test of an argument is the argument s ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 50
- In many countries people do not do enough to recycle their used materials glass paper metal What do you think are the reasons for this What do you think can be done to solve this problem 80
- The charts below show agricultural production in two different regions of the country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ollaborative efforts of both the people as well as the government. The impending write-ups...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42718446602 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81546702297 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546925566343 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.3093472044 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.75 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207856034669 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748461688288 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319196562035 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120238190885 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164381716583 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.