In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own o

These days, it is widely suggested that a group of high-wage earners exerts multiple advantageous impacts on their own nations, while those opposing to this advocate that an appropriate level of salaries should be applied. This essay will first make a discussion about the benefits of earning a great deal of money and then talk about a major drawback as authorities enact a law to control the number of wages earned.

First of all, people who get paid with extremely high salaries play an important role in the development of their country. These people could make use the most of their money to make a huge investment to their local residents and, therefore, increases the living standard of people here. Additionally, due to these great contributions, many social issues such as robbery, prostitution, unemployment and so on, could be significantly reduced, and thus greatly improves society. Taking India as a prime example, high-income earners help children go to school by reconstructing new roads for them.

On the other hand, being controlled salaries by governments, people have a tendency to leave their own countries and settle down in foreign countries which results in brain-drain problems, and thus a rapid depression could be witnessed. The absence of skilled employees, for instance, might lead to a loss of thousands of dollars, and it would take a long time to hire and train another one. Another thing is that it would be difficult for a nation’s economy to be recovered as its well-educated and skillful workforce is willing to work in another country where they are offered with high-paid income.

In conclusion, from my perspective, workers with extraordinarily well-paid salaries bring many benefits to their countries by making a huge contribution to the development of their own neighborhood. Meanwhile, setting a limit to the budget of a person could cause great damage to its own country with economic depression.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, another thing, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20317460317 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02164860503 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609523809524 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.3400832182 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6363636364 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7272727273 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247030966451 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086320977716 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467131244606 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141242592762 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00984649881585 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.