Many countries spend a lot of money on improved transport for urban area while neglected rural transport. What are the problems associated with this ? What are possible solutions?
In this contemporary epok, majority of nations spend myraid of funds on transportation system in urban areas instead of rural areas. In this essay, I will not only highlight the causative factors associated with this rubric yet also discuss potential measures to mitigate the hurdle.
Commencing with statement, there are several causes which rises if authorities spend a lot of money on transport only in cities as compared to countrysides. The cardinal point to be considered is that, rural areas would be undeveloped due to which individuals who live in villages they migrate towards towns. To be more precise, if people would move to cities thus population of towns would be increased. This also leads to pollution. For instance, in metropolitan cities, most of people live there because of better transport facilities. Whereas, rural areas would be demolished day by day. Therefore, pollution become more in cities thus more fatal diseases individual face.
However, this notion also have some solution which assist to overcome that hurdle. First and foremost, government should not only spend money on cities transportation rather by avoiding rural areas. To elucidate, if transportation facilities in villages are not better thus the nation is unable to well-developed. Because, villages play paramount role in development of country. To epitome, in India, around 70% of economic is depend on rural areas because of crops and transportation is quite better in India owing to this country is on developing stage. Hence, if nations spend money on rural transport thus the overall GDP of country would be flourished.
To recapitulate, although there are several causes of this phenomenon such as village become undeveloped or people may face fatal diseases. Yet, it also have measures viz, regime spend fund on rural transport due to which nation would be progress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 474, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
.... For instance, in metropolitan cities, most of people live there because of better transport ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 540, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...because of better transport facilities. Whereas, rural areas would be demolished day by...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...vernment should not only spend money on cities transportation rather by avoiding rural...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the nation is unable to well-developed. Because, villages play paramount role in develo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...me, in India, around 70% of economic is depend on rural areas because of crops and tra...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... spend money on rural transport thus the overall GDP of country would be flourish...
^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...e may face fatal diseases. Yet, it also have measures viz, regime spend fund on rura...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3063973064 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90979617963 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542087542088 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3066302861 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7058823529 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272242091592 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904210274843 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681350111882 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175530668444 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060455085461 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.