In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extend family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?

Essay topics:

In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extend family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?

Nowadays, city dwellers have a tendency to live in a single or nuclear family rather than a large extended family. From my own perspective, it is a positive trend because of two major factors involved.
The first reason is that living alone requires a person to have sufficient income and perform all the daily duties such as cooking and cleaning. As a result of this, young adults could become financially independent from their parents and they could make their own decisions with their lives. The cultivation of independent habits could then move to other areas and it could potentially increase the self-esteem of young people. Moreover, it is important for youngsters to demonstrate their independent skills because many employers prefer to hire candidates who can work independently.
The second reason is that there are many benefits for children who live in a small family. In many cities, it is common to see that both parents are working to earn a salary. As there are fewer babies in nuclear families, the income of two parents could provide a better living standard for their kids. It means that the children could receive better education, healthy foods and better medical treatment. In comparison, parents of large families might have a financial burden to nurture more children and they must work additional jobs to secure more income. Therefore, the parents would have less time to interact and educate their children. As a consequence of parents’ negligence, the kids may have social negative effects such as smoking, joining gang or committing crime.
In conclusion, I believe individuals could develop better independent skill when they live alone and the children could have various benefits of living in a small size family.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-17 nguyenken91 73 view
Essays by user nguyenken91 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 588, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... candidates who can work independently. The second reason is that there are many...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, may, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16842105263 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73696805828 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6788937579 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.214285714 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152037592848 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544993602741 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626864372826 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113000881484 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736739000901 0.056905535591 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.