In the contemporary life, many have the chace to get exposed to higher level of education, yet a lot of them also cannot find a decent job after graduating that leads to the situation of unemployment highly qualified graduates in societies. There are arguments for the reasons and ways to resolve this matter. This essay will express my own opinions and suggestions as a part of contribution to the discussion.
By looking at the big picture, the world has gradually evolved nowadays that requires the residents more range of knowledge than before. Learners must update and enrich their understanding every day in wider scope. This means students who graduated and are looking for a fixed jobs still have to spend more time for studying new things even they are postgraduates. Besides, they definitely have more competitors who had finished the similar major programme with them, particularly those who go to the same interview of their desired company. In this case, it is easier for them to fail the recruiment if they are not as competent as others.
Therefore, we can find out methods of improvement for this issue from the causes above. First and foremost, graduates must take responsibility for their process of learning from the beginning. They should not too focus on the score and degree they receive but their actual and practicable knowledge. Plenty of what they learn would become useless in their future career, so realising and concentrating on what really necessary is the key that helps them sucessfully applying for the job. Furthermore, it is good to perceive personal strengths and weaknesses. Sometimes the problem does not come from students' academic theories, it lays on the experience that they may lack, which can be improved by searching for more involved part-time jobs or field trips to take part in, or joining regular seminars in order to catch up with current scenariors is also an incredible way.
In conclusion, I think highly qualified graduates without employment is a common and harsh situation that many countries in the world have to cope with. As long as learners can pick up their niche and try to approach to it as much as possible in terms of the college theory and practical use , I believe they can have their wanted jobs soon.
- IELTS Task 1 Tables give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 78
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer Do you agree or disagree 73
- self introduction paragraphs Group 07 11
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views a 89
- IELTS 8 Test 3 Writing Task 1 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'job'?
Suggestion: job
...o graduated and are looking for a fixed jobs still have to spend more time for study...
^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to focus'?
Suggestion: to focus
...ing from the beginning. They should not too focus on the score and degree they receive bu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: LAYS_ATOP[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lies on'?
Suggestion: lies on
...ome from students academic theories, it lays on the experience that they may lack, whic...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of the college theory and practical use , I believe they can have their wanted jo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, really, so, still, therefore, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9502617801 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75910556634 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607329842932 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6672483054 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.1875 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217883767069 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641587107505 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770004349774 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140351710983 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699586129598 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.