In many countries, very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV. What do you think are the causes of this?
What solutions can you suggest?
There is an increasing concern in several countries that young people are not being read the newspaper and watching the news on tv. This could be happening because each juvenile has its own handphone to accommodate their daily lives.
Technology these days can easily access by all people around the world, especially young people. They use their mobile phones to get information and get socialized with other people. Therefore, young people do not use newspapers and TV news anymore. For them it is very boring to read newspapers and watch TV news, they believe the internet is more attractive than traditional media.
To enclosure this problem, media companies should provide several interactives and appealing media for young people. By doing this, the juvenile can easily read and watch the news without getting any bored. For example, a TV producer can introduce a new way to deliver news like giving an interactive mobile application. This application integrated with the real news show and young people can give any comments to respond to the current news. On the other hand, newspaper companies could give the same way as the TV companies do. This trick can make young people know the recent update from the current issue and get active by giving any feedback about the topic.
To conclude, young people still want to know the recent update about the news, but they can easily be distracted by their mobile phones. So, I suggest the news company can make an innovative idea from using technology and mobile application to make young people want to follow the update of the newspaper and watch TV news again.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, therefore, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00735294118 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47463068703 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525735294118 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1121204155 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2857142857 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287788754337 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119586318571 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697645943555 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190205570325 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253581804028 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.