Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourism industries. Why is this the case? Is it a positive development?
ourism in recent years has been booming onan unprecedented scale, with many developing countries considering it as a major income source. The main reason for this is the great revenueit generates, and I believe that it is a positive development in some countries that embrace sustainability, but a negative one in some others who are inclined towards mass tourism.
The major reason for the rapid growth of tourism is the great profits it might bring. Indeed, tourism has become one of the major players in international commerce, with many statistics indicating that the revenue it brings equals or even surpassesthat of many industrial fields such as garment, food production or oil exports. In cases of developing countries where technology in industrial areas is somewhat inferior todeveloped ones, tourism is deemed instrumental inpromoting economic well-being. Any country endowed withnatural beauties and historic sites can take advantage of those precious sources to boost their economy.
Sustainable tourism, with all economic, social and environmental angles being thoroughly taken into consideration, is a welcome development. It helps generate great profits, it is a good and healthy form of entertainment for tourists, and it also provides jobs for inhabitants living in tourist destinations. Reality Tours and Travel in India is a great example of such a tourism paradigm. Travellers taking the tour are provided with not only personal solacebut also valuable, thought-provokingexperiences about the locals’ lives, and the profits of the tours eventually go to the development of theimpoverishedareas in Mumbai and Delhi. However, in some other developing countries where mass tourismprevails, this has become a disaster. Influxesof touristsflocking to one area in peak seasons, littering all over the place, intervening in the locals’ traditional values and damaging the environment have plagued the overall well-being of those countries. The Great Pyramid of Giza in India, for example, has been reported to suffer from irreversible damageas a result of the enormous number of visitors coming there to see the site every year.
In conclusion, tourism has enjoyed increasing popularity in developing countries because it is a profitable economic sector. It can be a force for good if developed judiciously and sustainably, yet a catastropheif it is out of control and tampers withthe life and nature of the local areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-06 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-01 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-01 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | UP | 84 | view |
- ome people believe that teenagers should study all school subjects Others argue that they should focus on only the subjects that they are good at or find most interesting Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Many developing countries place a lot of importance on tourism Why is this Do you think that this is a positive or negative development 89
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 61
- People have historically attempted to achieve a perfect society However it is difficult to decide what a perfect society would be like What would be the most important element of an ideal society What can normal people do to make society more perfect 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ourism
ourism in recent years has been booming onan u...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56300268097 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46135131539 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600536193029 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2075182657 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8666666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291830350421 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922045411777 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766713252207 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187970567391 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621864724734 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ourism
ourism in recent years has been booming onan u...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56300268097 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46135131539 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600536193029 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2075182657 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8666666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291830350421 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922045411777 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766713252207 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187970567391 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621864724734 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.