Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourism industries. Why? Is it a positive development?
In many parts of the world, countries have a strategic approach to develop their tourism industries because of the ever-changing world. To the best of my knowledge, this point of view is grounded for the following reasons. This essay will present an overview of causes and the effects of this phenomenon.
Firstly, it is note-worthy that the growth of exploring cultural diversity is widely perceived as the main reason. Nowadays, many studies have shown that although it is invisible, the promotion of culture exchange is proportional to the increasing development of international travel. For example, in the past the Arabians used to consider Westerners as their foes because of different religious beliefs; however, thanks to higher interaction in various social aspects including tourism, now they have good relations in many fields. Secondly, another factor that has added fuel to the fire is the economic benefits. According to researches, the expansion of tourism fields creates new business or jobs for local people and surpluses to society.
In evaluating its impact, it is important to take potential development on society and individuals into account. From positive perspectives, the expansion of tourism industries is one of the contributive factors to widen knowledge about cultural differences. Therefore, it will be a grave mistake to overlook the fact that the increasing convenience of travelling is accompanied by the growth of engaging in other cultures. Besides, the counter-argument raised by opponents to this is that expanding tourism industries has negative impacts on environment, because many unconscious tourists intentionally do harm to nature and litter indiscriminately. For instance, according to the survey conducted by BBC News, in many countries in South East Asia, tourism has been a major cause of environmental pollution and destruction.
In conclusion, beneficial economies and culture exchange are the main reasons, which has both negative and positive effects on community as mentioned above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57419354839 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20813871368 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3895755345 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.428571429 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281923053868 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767112264836 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857142107793 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147059882161 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736287274169 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.