Many educational institutions give greater importance to subjects related to science and ignore subjects such as drama and literature.
Why is this? Is this a positive or negative development?
İt is regarded that educational corporations became cautious to educate science subjects rather than subjects related to art and literature due to a view that scientific knowledge is essential for a better future and career. Nevertheless, I consider this consideration is a positive development since humanity needs more improvements which are probable with science.
To begin with, there are several reasons why institutions are fully concentrated on science. The first reason is the importance of these subjects in the enlargement of the career and wealth. In more detail, scientists can earn more wealth and save other people due to their research on things that have an immense influence on humanity such as technologies and researches that welcome the developments of medical and economic structures which save millions of people because of the investments in scientific subjects. The second reason is that there are more job opportunities related to scientific subjects because this subject is important for a better future. Therefore, most of the parents and students are motivated to concentrate on having a career linked directly to these subjects.
The rise in the popularity of science is considered a positive development because of some reasons. Firstly, without science living conditions would be nothing like they are today, and life expectancy would be short. Moreover, science has allowed us to monitor for droughts, see the effects we have on the earth, and much more. Secondly, although art is undeniably an important aspect of civilization and the world would be dull without art and creativity, a great deal of creativity is required to make scientific breakthroughs, and art is just as often an expression of scientific knowledge. Even science stands behind mixing paint in the correct proportions or creating perspective in a drawing.
To conclude, I assume that science studies must be a focus of the educational institutions as it produces a positive impact on the economy of a country and improves the security of a state as well.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-01-20 | MinatureNomad | 73 | view |
2020-10-24 | khangnguyen12345 | 64 | view |
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 81
- The bar chart below shows figures for annual coffee and meat consumption 78
- Many educational institutions give greater importance to subjects related to science and ignore subjects such as drama and literature Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Television is dangerous because it destroys family life and any sense of community instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 92
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32110091743 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08123970182 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553516819572 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.102809139 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.846153846 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261673927106 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882728145496 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756911827897 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155978223461 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744531655622 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.