Many educational institutions give greater importance to subjects related to science and ignore subjects such as drama and literature.
Why is this?
Is this a positive or negative development?
It is indisputable that edification plays a crucial function in developing society. Many educational adjustment have illustrated to people that the science subject such as Math, Physics, Chemistry are more significant, and subjects like drama and literature seems to be ignored exceedingly. In this essay; I would show the reasons why this happened and analysis this deficient or good.
It is clear that many edification institutions have given extra necessary to subjects like Math, Physics and Chemistry in recently years. The most suitable reason for this account is that those subjects are required in many jobs and massive occupation. For instance, if your passion is to become a doctor, so you must have to study Chemistry and Biology in high school; if you have a dream to become a scientist, so learning Math, English, Physics and Biology in high school is commanded definitely. We could comprehend that those science subjects contain a bunch of essential knowledge which are fundamental for university. Another reason is that when you finish your specialty in university or college; there will be a variety of jobs with reasonable salary waiting for you.
About the improvement, I strongly think it depends on who choose the right way. For example, people who excellent at science subject could study some major like mechanic, architect and doctor. But it is exceedingly bad for whom choose wrong major to learn; this could lead to stressful. At least, this could be a positive enlargement because the more people good at science, the more will society develop.
In conclusion, many edification establishments have given extra tension to major like Math, Physics and Chemistry in current years because those subjects are compulsory in many jobs and massive occupation. This could be a positive improvement because the more people good at science, the more will society develop.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-20 | MinatureNomad | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-24 | khangnguyen12345 | 64 | view |
- Some think scientists should be allowed to send messages into space to communicate with other life forms while others believe this is too dangerous Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 90
- The graph below gives information from a report about the purpose and frequency of Internet use by medical students in 2009 in one country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- It is sometimes suggested that primary schoolchildren should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 83
- Computers today can quickly and accurately translate languages therefore it is a waste of time to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- On balance advertising is more harmful than beneficial To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...ovement, I strongly think it depends on who choose the right way. For example, peop...
^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to wrong'
Suggestion: to wrong
...t it is exceedingly bad for whom choose wrong major to learn; this could lead to stre...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cience, the more will society develop. In conclusion, many edification establis...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26402640264 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83170624745 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511551155116 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1988883233 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.928571429 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274784011283 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988293452891 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814139977888 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194869270036 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115796966498 0.056905535591 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.