Living in the tech world, nowadays, it is easy to apply high-tech devices in working at home. This raises an argument of whether these conveniences support employees or employers. I believe workers are the side that takes advantage of this.
At first, working at home means people can do whatever they want without any eyes looking at them. Sometimes, it is stressed by knowing that employees' different or weird actions may catch everybody's eyes. Virtually people pretend to be elegant at their offices, so working at home would be a great opportunity for them to relax and be themself. Secondly, workers can arrange their working schedule for the day. Instead of waking up early in the morning and grabbing food from a random store on the way to the office, home workers now can wake up late a little bit then might end up working later than usual. Furthermore, they also can have lunch or snacks at any time of the day. The freedom, relaxing, and flexible working timetable provide employees an ideal working space.
For employers, it is challenging to fully control the working process of their workers. Physical distance is a big deal for the supervisor because what people see through the internet may not be what actually happens. Consequently, employees can easily make a delay for their work or make an excuse for some mistakes without much concern of being scolded by the boss. This would lead to a decrease in working productivity, which is against the development that employers want.
To sum up, with the help of modern technology, employees take full advantage of working at home.
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers not the employers Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The current trend in education is to move away from traditional exams and instead have continuous assessment over the school year What do you think of this trend Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or exp 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 553, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ce, home workers now can wake up late a little bit then might end up working later than us...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89298892989 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61734189885 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616236162362 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.483748185 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303577719665 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975817406813 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573806026928 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179900387991 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065135832451 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.