Many famous sports players advertise products What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development

Essay topics:

Many famous sports players advertise products. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development?

Nowadays, sports persons are often seen endorsing products. Although these could help them to earn some extra income, these may have detrimental effects on their game play and viewers.

To commence with, entrepreneurs pay hefty amounts / a hefty amount to promote their products in market because promotions play an imperative role in the growth of their business. Therefore, sportsmen are being offered many benefits other than regular remuneration such as lifetime deals and partnerships in profits. For instance, Nike has announced a lifetime deal with famous football player Cristiano Ronaldo for 1 billion USD. These kinds of deals help them to increase their monetary value and lead a luxurious lifestyle. Moreover, owing to the ubiquitous nature of adverts their fame reaches farther corners of the world including small towns and villages.

However, as the players are widely known through promotions there will be huge expectations from them in the game and players often fall prey to stress which could have a significant impact on their field performance. When players fall short of their fans’ expectations, they face criticism and this may even cause depression in them. Another downside is that some really talented players will lose focus in the game once they start making easy money through endorsements. Eventually, it will hurt their game and they will lose both their career and their endorsement deals. This is a loss for them as well as their nation.

To conclude, by endorsing products players earn fame and money. However, there are downsides to this practice, as commercial deals may hurt the performance of the player by putting them under too much pressure or making them lose focus in the game.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-20 minhtrang2k9 11 view
2023-09-20 minhtrang2k9 11 view
2023-09-20 minhtrang2k9 11 view
2023-09-11 tungta 78 view
2023-09-11 hiMn 11 view
Essays by user 81206Ecema :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23381294964 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62585840922 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615107913669 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8980657536 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.928571429 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118616909948 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466086995957 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374731555754 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739214062249 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327147464024 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.