Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically
Do you think the advantages overweigh its advantages?
It is true that there are many people choose local food because of its environmental and economic value instead of using shipping food from a long-distance. Although this trend is not without disadvantage, the upsides will justify these.
On the other hand, there are several drawbacks of using local food to replace shipping food but the main one is the lack of diverse cuisines in local places. With the increase in the standard of living, more and more people have a high demand for different foods to supply for their daily meals. This means that today with the expansion of delivering food services that meet human needs such as convenience and saving time, leading to local food retailers have disappeared from many neighborhoods.
On the other hand, I would argue that the drawback above is eclipsed by two main positive points. First, if people eat at local restaurants, it is conducive to the environment. This means that eating at local food chains not only reduces the rate of using plastic bags to deliver foods from far away but also increases the maintaining of fresh ingredients of foods, leading to contribute to protect the environment and raise the safe hygiene standard of people as well. Second, to save a great deal of money, utilizing local food is an ideal choice. The local food price is relatively reasonable for all dishes whether food transportation from far distance accounts for a large amount of money on delivering cost.
In consumption, eating local food takes advantage of the improvement in environment and cost efficiency rather than utilizing shipping food, which brings many benefits for people.
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. Agree or Disagree? 61
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Topic: Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. Agree or Disagree? 78
- Topic: Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. Agree or Disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...lue instead of using shipping food from a long-distance. Although this trend is not without dis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05904059041 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7152303521 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579335793358 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6998868156 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.636363636 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390514035216 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148406425486 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904080337544 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250143446036 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00656960343402 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.