Topic: Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. Agree or Disagree?
Some people are argued that preventing environmental degradation is eradicated by national authorities and large enterprises instead of individuals. I totally disagree with this idea because of two main reasons.
Each person can contribute to combat to the biological crisis since the effect of their daily behaviors to companies and industrial zones which discharge chemical wastes to the environment. By reducing the dependence on fossil fuels and un-biodegradable products like plastic bags, which affects enterprises’ profit, manufacturing factories are likely to stop to produce these goods to the utilizing market. Furthermore, their claims incredibly influent on policies of the government which impose official bans on natural resources destruction.
Everyone can make a big difference, provided that they aware of the green movement. This means that if each person improves their awareness of preserving the environment, the community tends to achieve sustainable development. Take Vietnam as a prime example in the power of a person directly effect on society. With a journey throughout Vietnam, a teacher named Thang had shared the need for alternative energy resources to society, leading to plenty of people who tend to utilize wind and solar energies in lieu of fossil fuels. As a result, if almost individual gives their hand in taking action on environmental problems, it alleviates the burden of authorities’natural resources protection.
In conclusion, individuals play an integral role in pretending the destruction of the environment. Without each of the people, the national and local authorities and large companies are not possible to make the grade in their authorities.
- Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economicallyDo you think the advantages overweigh its advantages? 61
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses. Why do they do that? Who benefit more from this, the community or these young people. 84
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skill.What are the causes of this and suggest possible solutions to this problem 84
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...t which impose official bans on natural resources destruction. Everyone can make a big ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 680, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
... the burden of authorities'natural resources protection. In conclusion, individual...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72156862745 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41506714183 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650980392157 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2988292331 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.583333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167112325453 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059001153528 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590049897848 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890454043151 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027595054458 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.