Topic: Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. Agree or Disagree?
Many people think that preventing environmental degradation is the responsibility of national authorities and large enterprises instead of individuals. I completely disagree with this idea because of two main reasons.
Each person can contribute to combat the ecological crisis because of their daily consumption effects on producing enterprises. By reducing the dependence on fossil fuels and un-biodegradable products like plastic bags which remain as waste products in thousand of years, manufacturing factories are likely to stop to produce these goods to the market, leading to decrease on discharging disposable wastes to the environment. Furthermore, citizens' claims incredibly influence on policies of the government which adopt official bans on using natural resources excessively such as cutting down trees without planting new trees to replace them.
Everyone can make a big difference by spreading out the responsibility of themselves to their community. This means that if each person improves their awareness of preserving the environment, the society can achieve sustainable natural developments. Take Vietnam as a prime example in the power of a person directly affect to society. With a journey throughout Vietnam, a teacher named Thang shared his experience about the need for alternative energy resources in minority groups with social network websites, leading to increasing plenty of people who utilize wind and solar energies rather than fossil fuels like coal. Additionally, if individuals give their hand in taking action on environmental problems, it alleviates the burden of authorities’ natural resources protection.
In conclusion, individuals are considered as an integral role in preventing the destruction of the natural world. Without each of the people, the national and local authorities and large companies are not possible to gain their goals in their policies.
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses. Why do they do that? Who benefit more from this, the community or these young people. 84
- Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. Agree or Disagree? 61
- Topic: Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. Agree or Disagree? 61
- Topic: Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. Agree or Disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... bags which remain as waste products in thousand of years, manufacturing factories are l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 766, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...the burden of authorities' natural resources protection. In conclusion, individual...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80427046263 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26690779119 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644128113879 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.5080767635 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.916666667 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145626470449 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526119945162 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047260136959 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759949414594 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303427862946 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.