Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Governments often prioritize economic progress as their primary objective, aiming to boost GDP, attract investments, and create job opportunities. However, there are individuals who contend that focusing solely on economic development neglects other essential aspects of a country's progress. They argue that social well-being, environmental sustainability, and cultural preservation are equally significant.
Supporters of economic progress argue that a strong economy translates into higher living standards and improved quality of life. Economic growth generates wealth, enabling governments to invest in social welfare programs, healthcare, and education. For instance, a thriving economy can provide funds for infrastructure development, such as building hospitals and schools, which benefit the entire population.
Nevertheless, proponents of a broader notion of progress emphasize the need to consider social equality, environmental sustainability, and cultural heritage. They contend that a country cannot achieve true progress if these dimensions are neglected. Social equality ensures that all citizens have equal access to opportunities, regardless of their socioeconomic background. Environmental sustainability is crucial to protect natural resources and mitigate the negative impact of economic activities on the planet. Preserving cultural heritage safeguards a nation's identity and promotes diversity and inclusivity.
For example, countries with high economic growth rates may face rising income inequality, where only a small portion of the population reaps the benefits. This can lead to social unrest and instability. Additionally, environmental degradation resulting from unregulated economic activities can harm ecosystems, exacerbate climate change, and compromise the well-being of future generations. Moreover, overlooking cultural preservation can erode unique traditions, languages, and historical landmarks, diminishing a nation's distinct identity.
In my opinion, a comprehensive approach that balances economic, social, environmental, and cultural progress is essential for a country's long-term development and the well-being of its people. Governments should strive for sustainable economic growth while ensuring social equity, environmental stewardship, and cultural preservation. By pursuing a holistic agenda, nations can achieve inclusive and sustainable progress that benefits all citizens and safeguards the planet for future generations.
- These days consumers are faced with an increasing amount of advertising from various companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertising What measures should be taken to protect them 84
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can be better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading To what extend do you agree 67
- What are advantages and disadvantages of living a number of different places during your childhood years 78
- Doctors should be responsible for educating their patients about how to improve their health To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- companies should provide sports facilities for local communities To what extend do you agree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 557, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...eserving cultural heritage safeguards a nations identity and promotes diversity and inc...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 514, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
..., and historical landmarks, diminishing a nations distinct identity. In my opinion, a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2162.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.65230769231 5.12529762239 130% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3676272967 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630769230769 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6960359613 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.111111111 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183537476008 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057581131098 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400244106556 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111051027022 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416784933058 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 10.91 50.2224549098 22% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.99 12.4159519038 169% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.48 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.