Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.
Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, food and drink that contains high levels of sugar are becoming increasingly popular. There are several reasons why people argue that we should produce sugary products with higher prices to encourage people to consume less sugar, but I completely disagree with the idea.
It is true that sugary products are harmful for people health but we should not increase the price of those products to reduce sugary consumption. Firstly, it is difficult to do that because this will affect to the sales of companies that are producing food and drink. If companies manufactured sugary products decide raise their price, it is likely to reduce the number of people who can afford and they will not be good for them. Another thing that we need to consider is that people could find other products to buy instead of those products. So, governments cannot ban citizens from buying what they want to eat regardless of sugary products are in high prices or not.
On the other hand, governments would have a lot of way to encourage people to consume less sugar. One of the feasible solutions is education. Students should be taught about the negative consequences that illnesses related to high levels of sugar bring. In this way, they have the aware of the dangerous of this unhealthy lifestyle. Another way should be done after that is for politicians encourage more restaurants or companies produce healthy products by subsiding or reduce tax so that there are more options for every people rather than sugary products that are predominant today.
In conclusion, there are various ways to reduce sugary consumption and I believe that increasing the prices of those products is not the good way.
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 84
- The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15 year olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK 73
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 61
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles would be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, another thing, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98586572438 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54950363497 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526501766784 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1680017777 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.538461538 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366518520329 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127813867092 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805231620084 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225239229838 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102095634073 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.