Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
In the modern day, the problem of homeowners hardly pay attention to museums and historical sites which has raised a great deal of public attention. There are various reasons behind these issues, numerous measures have been proposed to tackle this.
On the one hand, there are two main factors why museums are numerously interested by visitors rather than inhabitants. Firstly, it is attributable to the fact that those native people are familiar with many historical sites, which have already existed for a long time in their residential areas. As a result, the majority of local dwellers gradually lost their interests and curiosity about many items being exhibited in museums. Secondly, due to the hustle and bustle of a modern lifestyle, a great deal of one’s time on weekdays are occupied by a wide range of workload and education. Therefore, on the weekend, neighbor-dwellers usually spend time for their family or friends instead of going out to pay a visit to common places in their neighbors.
On the other hand, local authorities have to carry on a whole host of actions to encourage their citizens to pay more concentration to many such places as museums or ancient sites. Domestic media plays a vital role in boosting attention from native residents to those places. For example, documentary films about domestic history should be released as well as more focusing on historical galleries’ activities than politics or celebrities. In addition, a wide range of workshops need to be held to let neighbor-dwellers have a through inside into their identity and traditional values from these museums and historical sites. Moreover, free tickets may act as significant impacts to homeowners, who spend an amount of time at the coffeeshops on the weekend.
In conclusion, the familiarity with museums and historical sites may lead to tedious emotion of people in residential areas. However, making a free of charge tickets may witness an upward rate of paying attention to such places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | mbn250 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | mbn250 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | mbn250 | 61 | view |
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century Some people think that preventing these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resource To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The following diagrams show the present and future water supply system of a city 61
- Encouraging people to use public transport is the best way to solve traffic problems in the cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 78
- Encouraging people to use public transport is the best way to solve traffic problems in the cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: THROUGH_THOROUGH[1]
Message: Did you mean 'thorough' (accurate, exhaustive)?
Suggestion: thorough
...be held to let neighbor-dwellers have a through inside into their identity and traditio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17283950617 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92334626084 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570987654321 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9080222669 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.714285714 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223077321533 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662102689809 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489037302953 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121186807356 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252839186553 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.