Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
In the world, museums are always a special place for tourists to visit and discover ancient masterpieces such as pictures, monuments, or even archeological rocks. Back in the past, museums were most freely opened for visitors, but nowadays, several of those have been charging for admission, which contains both advantages and disadvantages.
On the one hand, paying an entry fee sometimes will bring benefits for both the investor and visitors. First of all, those masterpieces are priceless and the protecting procedure must be carried carefully, which requires more workers and equipment. From time to time, the museum facility will be degraded, the owner has to spend more money to rebuild and renew the infrastructure to maintain the best service for people. Besides, if someone who is willing to pay their money to enter inside, they deserve to receive the precious knowledge of all times and enjoy themselves in the museum’s atmosphere.
On the other hand, there are some drawbacks when charging for admission. If the policy of not charging for entry remains, more people will come to those places, especially students and elderly people who don’t have much money. Moreover, visitors will feel more comfortable enjoying those pictures because sometimes, their journey costs a lot, therefore, good rumors, as well as their reputation will spread widely, which will attract more foreigner's attention.
In conclusion, the rule of entry paying has clear benefits with many supporting reasons. In my opinion, there are so many explanations of freely entering will be better for everyone who desires to discover at once.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 38, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put between 'will' and 'bring'.
Suggestion: will sometimes bring
.... On the one hand, paying an entry fee sometimes will bring benefits for both the investor and visi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foreigners'' or 'foreigner's'?
Suggestion: foreigners'; foreigner's
... spread widely, which will attract more foreigners attention. In conclusion, the rule of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32170542636 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74723093456 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643410852713 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7160000577 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.818181818 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1818181818 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213049447435 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894307951475 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724749514032 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132685302073 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600462541752 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.