Many newspapers and magazines feature stories about the private lives of famous people. We know what they eat, where they buy their clothes and who they love. We also often see pictures of them in private situation. Is it appropriate for magazine or newspaper to give this kind of private information about people?
The life of celebrities has been, is and will remain the object of close attention of the public. The media reveals the secrets of famous people. It is embarrassing to determine where curiosity ends and the crime begins on the part of newspapers and magazines and whether they actually can be sources of this kind of information. Despite the fact that some people suppose that celebrities have rights to privacy, in my opinion, fans have the right to know who they worship.
To start with, just publicity of famous people causes such an enormous concern in their personal lives. In this instance, the data from the media sufficiently often become the sole way to monitor public people. A particularly significant role is played by interviews printed by newspapers and magazines. In this case, the state of such people require an open dialogue with periodicals, since they personify certain moral values and lifestyle, serve as guidelines for the acceptance or rejection of certain phenomena and act as positive or negative examples. This explains the public interest in all aspects of their lives. And the report of the details of the celebrities' private lives carried out by the media, is due to the influence that their behavior has on the formation of value orientations and the lifestyle of society.
In addition, personal information somewhat creates work for public persons and brings them money. So, the more recognizable an individual is, the more tickets for a concert will be sold or the large box office a film will collect. Thus, the disclosure of private data by magazines can be an excellent business between publishers and celebrities, and therefore requires a lot of informational investments. Moreover, the European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly indicated in its decisions that public figures are given less protection from media publications than ordinary citizens. And a person leading an active public life does not have the same immunity to protect the secrets of a personal life, since such restrictions will contradict the public interest and restrict the rights of the media.
In conclusion, from my point of view, the reverse side of fame has not been canceled and any publication by periodicals is not merely an opportunity, but a necessity of the modern world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | Kate_khotko | 84 | view |
| 2018-02-07 | zain.ahmad | 56 | view |
| 2016-08-25 | ravibharaths | 67 | view |
| 2015-10-14 | manikn10 | 90 | view |
| 2015-06-10 | nikkiarief | 80 | view |
- Nowadays more people are choosing to live with friends or alone rather than with their families. This trend is likely to have a negative impact on communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 87
- Many newspapers and magazines feature stories about the private lives of famous people. We know what they eat, where they buy their clothes and who they love. We also often see pictures of them in private situation. Is it appropriate for magazine or newsp 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ince they personify certain moral values and lifestyle, serve as guidelines for t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14248021108 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84579291687 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569920844327 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8508057238 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.8125 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6875 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143952097565 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468335135532 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041311832709 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841050391167 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683581711232 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.