Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can ba taken to tackle this problem?
In many cases, after they serve their first sanction, a lot of criminals recommit again. This may occur due to a number of reasons; however, fortunately, there are some steps that can be implemented to alleviate this phenomenon.
To begin with, what makes a criminal re-offend after they finish a punishment is that they do not get a sufficient sanction. For instance, many criminals are punished by being sentenced in prisons, and because many of these prisons are luxurious, this cannot be considered as a suitable deter for their crimes. Furthermore, due to the lack of rehabilitation in prisons, most criminals are not able to learn from their faults, which makes them liable to commit the same kinds of crimes again and again.
To solve this dilemma, the government can take a number of measures in order to resolve this issue. First, a sufficient and deterrent sanction could be applied to the offender. To illustrate more, prisons should not be such luxurious, and instead criminals should be put in harsh environments. Furthermore, some criminals should be rehabilitated and taught to be more aware about others' rights. For example, those who drive under the effect of alcohol may be punished by serving in hospitals to be aware of their careless actions.
In conclusion, if criminals do not face suitable and deterring sanctions for their crimes, they can commit more offences. Thus, a robust sanction system, which can be implemented by the government, would be the best way to mitigate, or even eradicate, this phenomenon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-11 | rania sayed ahmed | 56 | view |
- There are fewer controls on the designs and construction of home and office buildings. So people can build them whatever they like.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 73
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are those problems?Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or e 61
- More people decided to have children in their later age than in the past. Why?Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in many cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09881422925 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87027289045 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557312252964 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7896885981 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201991498602 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838605617482 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551060561143 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142523023994 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420960269306 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.