Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment , why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem.
People tend to question why prisoners aim to enter prison again after their first punishment. There are many reasons to entering prison again. The prisoner might be psychologically unstable or poor that he can’t afford shelter, food, and water. The solution is simply providing some service and care.
To begin with, psychological instability causes people to behave like unconsciously thus making them act irrationally leading themselves to prison. For example, a person who suffers from kleptomania, which is a person who can’t stop the urge to steal, will keep on stealing none stop until he or she gets cured. Furthermore, prison provides shelter, food, and water for free resulting in prisoners either entering in the first place or entering again. For instance, a beggar with no shelter and necessities will commit a simple crime simply to live with no cost. If you were a beggar with no money wouldn’t you do anything to survive?
Therefore, the solution is supplying the prisoners some medication and care to also avoid harming others. For example, in the psychological illness they could go and get cured from the illness instead of going to prison in the first place. In addition, the government would want to provide food and water with no return for beggars not to starve.
To sum up, people are suffering from certain problems and it is the reason of their entry to prison. If the government simply provided medication for the ill and some basic necessities for the poor these prisoners wouldn’t have entered prison in the first place.
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health issues involved.Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in the school curriculum.To what extent do you agree or 61
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment , why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem. 11
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the USA and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999. 78
- The chart below gives information about social networking sites people used in Canada between 2014 and 2015 . 73
- In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could .Why do you think this is ? What can be done to change this ? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mply providing some service and care. To begin with, psychological instability...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dn't you do anything to survive? Therefore, the solution is supplying the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... no return for beggars not to starve. To sum up, people are suffering from cer...
^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...rovided medication for the ill and some basic necessities for the poor these prisoners wouldn&apo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, to begin with, to sum up, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10465116279 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79586085677 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577519379845 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5565086324 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0714285714 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0665717005846 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272694097631 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272633478535 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0472913639363 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308287767527 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.