Many people are using mobile phone and computers to communicate. Therefore, people are losing the ability to communicate with each other face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Many people are using mobile phone and computers to communicate. Therefore, people are losing the ability to communicate with each other face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Discussing about using mobile phones and computers are becoming popular at present. Some people prefer using cell phones and computers to keep in touch with together, while others believe that technology does not bring the real world by face to face to communicate. In my opinion, I agree with using cell phones and computers comfortably more than.
Nowadays, using technology play an important role in everyday lives because there are so many benefits that cell phones and computers as a powerful tool which can bear many advantages for our survival. In the beginning, mobile phones and computers have revolutionized the way we communicate. For example, most overseas students who away from their home always use cell phones to get touch with their family, their friends, and colleagues by making a video call or maybe send a text message with them, owing to people can conduct contact with each other whenever they want and can avoid their homesick. Secondly, there are many companies apply technology into their business. For instance, they can conduct their business meeting by video messaging to connect with their workers. Furthermore, most shops online used to cell phones to chatting with their customers because it is more convenient and faster to use.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against benefits of using technology to speak with each other; I believe that using cell phones and computers is one of the best ways to connect with anybody.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by user Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'face to'.
Suggestion: face to
...nology does not bring the real world by face to face to communicate. In my opinion, I agree wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56967985537 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574380165289 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.9505916136 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.3 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302143933773 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135212245475 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774539154191 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235692975023 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835777497027 0.056905535591 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.