Many people argue that museums and art galleries should present the national art as opposed to art works from other countries To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Many people argue that museums and art galleries should present the national art, as opposed to art works from other countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Without any doubt society is divided into two groups with the different mindset of people. Therefore, this has become a debatable issue whether, museums and art galleries should exhibit the art of the particular nations, while other artworks from other nations. This essay will not only articulate on both perceptions but also my point of view in conclusion.
To commence with, the first notion there are myriad of things to be shared in this favour. First of all, preserving the nation’s arts and crafts transmits the cultural importance of that particular country. It is the greatest inheritance of that nation. Precisely, nations art evokes the strong emotions of the people when the art and museum presents their national art. The second point is that, it proclaims the cultural norms of the ancestors. Through which shows the fabric of society that hand something down from generations. To exemplify, the plates and cups that used by ancestors helps to understand about the difference and development of cultural and traditions.
As a consequence, it is indispensable to project nations art in museums. Moving to the second argument of this debate, the first point of this issue is that arts from of that nation will not boost the national income. To elucidate, if arts from same country tourist attractions will be less. local people would not be interested to visit frequently. However, when museum projecting form other countries which attracts both national and international tourists which rise the nation’s budget. Moreover, students will get chance to assimilate the cultural of other countries. As a result, artworks from international level helps the national museums to be a beneficial in other ways.
In conclusion, to my perspective, I concur that both national and international arts and crafts should be presented to enhance the prestige and income of any countries.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Local
...untry tourist attractions will be less. local people would not be interested to visit...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25412541254 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85819251472 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541254125413 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7230862173 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4444444444 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351359752968 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107468675117 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110479784663 0.0667982634062 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218488686636 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397788093736 0.056905535591 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.