Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views

Essay topics:

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers. Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Education is a crucial aspect of a society's development, and the quality of education heavily relies on the effectiveness of teachers. While some believe that allowing high school students to voice their opinions on teachers' performance is beneficial for educational quality, others argue that it can lead to disciplinary issues. This essay will discuss both views and provide my own perspective on the matter.

On the one hand, some argue that high school students should be encouraged to give feedback on their teachers' performance to improve educational quality. Firstly, students are the primary stakeholders in the education system, and their insights can help teachers tailor their teaching methods to better suit the students' learning styles. Secondly, student feedback can provide teachers with constructive criticism and identify areas where they need improvement. Thirdly, giving students a platform to express their thoughts can foster a sense of mutual respect and trust between teachers and students.

On the other hand, others contend that allowing students to criticize their teachers can lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Firstly, students may not have the necessary qualifications or experience to assess their teacher's performance accurately, leading to unfair or unjustified criticism. Secondly, students may abuse the power to criticize their teachers, leading to an unprofessional and disrespectful classroom environment. Thirdly, some students may use criticism as a tool to settle personal grudges or as a means of retaliation.

In my opinion, while it is essential to encourage high school students to give feedback on their teacher's performance, it should be done in a structured and respectful manner. Teachers should have the discretion to determine the form and method of feedback, and students should be educated on the proper protocol for giving feedback. It is crucial to establish a culture of mutual respect and trust between teachers and students, and feedback should be viewed as a means of improvement rather than criticism.

In conclusion, while some believe that allowing high school students to voice their opinions on their teacher's performance is beneficial for educational quality, others argue that it can lead to disciplinary issues. My perspective is that feedback should be encouraged, but it should be done in a structured and respectful manner. By establishing a culture of mutual respect and trust between teachers and students, we can improve the quality of education while maintaining discipline in the classroom.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-02-24 Adamfaker 73 view
2023-02-24 Adamfaker 67 view
2022-10-20 nhungnhungnhungnhung 84 view
2022-07-27 Daniel goger 78 view
Essays by user Adamfaker :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ool students to voice their opinions on teachers performance is beneficial for education...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55415617128 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06157373944 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415617128463 0.561755894193 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.000681549 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.705882353 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3529411765 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437937090037 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163342163418 0.084324248473 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781411098574 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276267171638 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261841286591 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.