While many people go to university for academic study, more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers. Agree or disagree
In a generation where demand for higher academic education reaches its peak, there’s a hot debate over whether more people should take up job-related training in order to strengthen the work force or not. Even though vocational training is necessary, I still side with those who choose to seek further study.
On the one hand, filling in the missing spots of blue-collar workers and creating an easier career path may be the two key reasons why it is thought that vocational practice should be considered. First of all, the lack of a manual labor force has recently been a persistent problem in many developed countries; doing skills training, therefore, can improve the situation. Secondly, students who don’t have the ability to undergo such academic study may find their suitable future career when attending vocational programs, owing to the fact that the exercise is more approachable and doesn't require much skill.
On the other hand, despite the mentioned discussion, I still opt for better academic study. Furthermore, the demands for jobs like doctors, engineers, teachers,… which are all well-respected and require a certain certification or diploma, are climbing dramatically, and the solution to meet the aforementioned requests is to encourage students to apply to a university. Moreover, due to the century of technology, robots and smart artificial intelligence are gradually replacing traditional jobs, which is making vocational training unnecessary.
In conclusion, encouraging people to attend pre-employment courses is a good way to cope with their nation’s current economic struggles; the merits of higher academic learning, however, still outweigh those of vocational programs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-24 | buiquan | 56 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | buiquan | 56 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | buiquan | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-17 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-07 | vevinawynn | 61 | view |
- While many people go to university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Agree or disagree 84
- While many people go to university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Agree or disagree 56
- While many people go to university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Agree or disagree 56
- While many people go to university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Agree or disagree 56
- While many people go to university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 584, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t the exercise is more approachable and doesnt require much skill. On the other hand,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...r jobs like doctors, engineers, teachers,… which are all well-respected and requir...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5632183908 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07939212546 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674329501916 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.9887175063 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.333333333 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.2222222222 7.06120827912 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247755015067 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821170183689 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339942663895 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12751127764 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336498723392 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.56 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.