Many people argue that society is becoming less and less polite. What is your opinion?
A number of people in modern society are said to behave in worse manners than before, whether less respectful to the elderly in families or being rude to strangers. I believe in this statement.
Untold evidences from our experiences can be found to prove this statement. Firstly, technology makes its own contribution to the losing of politeness through increasing indifference among people. For example, it is the dominance of mobile phone and Facebook messager that has largely reduced the willingness of people, especially youngsters, to have face-to-face conversations with their family members. This lack of real-life bonding leads to an indifference among people, making them careless, inconsiderate and less respectful of others’ feelings. For example, the younger generation who are attached to mobile phones all the time could forget to give seats to their grandparents in family gatherings, showing less respect to the elder generation. The fast-pace and hectic lifestyle in modern society is another contributing factor to poor manners. Compared to last few decades, today’s people are inflicted with loads of work and are under much heavier pressure of all kinds. As a result, the majority of them tend to have too limited time to get out of their way to help strangers or to show good manners everywhere through minor details such as putting chairs under the table before they leave the food court. Sometimes even expressing the gratitude to waiters in a Café seems to occupy too much time for a workaholic.
However, the above factors do not affect everyone. Most elderly people, compared to younger ones, are less vulnerable to the impact of technology, as they prefer direct communication. They also stick to traditional virtues and moral values more firmly, which prevent them from offending others. Furthermore, inappropriate behaviours of students could be corrected by teachers, and mass media also can facilitate people to establish moral values and ethical standards, which help to retain politeness in the society. Nevertheless, if these assistances were able to work, why there is still a number of news about impolite, rude and indifferent behaviours in the newspaper every day?
The above analysis suggests that our society is losing politeness, and this problem is especially severe among young people.
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The tendency of human race copying each other is shown in the popularity of fashion in clothes and other consumer products. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 93
- Some people believe that when designing a building the most important thing to be considered is the function rather than the appearance To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- Humans tend to copy one another, especially in fashion, choice of cloths and consumer goods. Do you agree or disagree. Provide your reasons and example from your own experience. 23
- It has become easier and more affordable for people to travel to other countries Do you think it is a positive or a negative development Give your opinion and relevant examples from your experience 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 590, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[5]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much news', 'a good deal of news'.
Suggestion: much news; a good deal of news
...s were able to work, why there is still a number of news about impolite, rude and indifferent be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39130434783 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93964472443 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1647970624 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.705882353 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6470588235 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105197330574 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307805388353 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421800106272 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0743902484119 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415411074889 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.