Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?
In today’s modern world, being a consumer is often seen as a normal thing. In order to satisfy the needs of all the consumers, countries are forced to produce a wide variety of goods. Some people think that the industry should provide them with a higher quantity of products. I totally disagree because our resources are limited and the increased production will pollute our environment.
First and foremost, the resources of our planet are expendable but are also being wasted on regular basis. It should be noted that the wide selection of raw goods provided by our planet must be preserved for future generations. Keeping the water reservoirs, like natural springs, is of big importance and serves as a perfect example. In addition, people waste a significant amount of resources on goods which are not necessary. For example, consumers tend to buy a lot of clothes but at the same time wear only a fraction of what they own. It is quite obvious that the scarce amount of materials we are provided should not be allowed to be wasted on meaningless stuff.
Due to the massive use of resources, our planet is being harmed and thus natural disasters occur ever more often. The massive amount of deforestation is leaving the planet with horrendous scars. Consequences such as the extinction of a lot of plants and whole groups of animals changing their ecosystem are constantly shown on the television. Furthermore, we tend to pollute the environment with the production of goods. As an example are the countless petroleum spills in the ocean or the industrial gases which contribute to the greenhouse effect. In general, our planet is suffering because our actions are led by a consumer’s greed.
Overall, I completely disagree that the constant increase of the production industry is a proper goal because the amount of resources that are labeled as trash and thrown away is simply too much and should not increase in the future.
- Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal? 33
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion, is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... satisfy the needs of all the consumers, countries are forced to produce a wide v...
^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly shown on the television. Furthermore, we tend to pollute the environment with ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98773006135 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83222372202 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549079754601 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1716502698 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6470588235 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206989715103 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557802423387 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488088428022 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130382431978 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484218376488 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.