Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes.
In this day and age, tourism development has had profound effects on certain aspects of a country’s economy. However, a majority of domestic residents deny the advantages of internation tourism and regard it as a problematic factor for the nation. There are a host of factors attributed to this idea as well as solutions to address this issue.
Undeniably, besides economic benefits, international tourists has inflicted certain harms on some aspects the country, namely environment and health. For a start, as the Covid-19 pandemic has broken out in the world, international tourists are potential sources of the spread of this fatal virus, hence the unwelcoming expression of the local towards these foreigners. As more and more people infected the virus, the domestic residents tend to have negative attitudes toward international tourists. A second point to consider is that some tourists, without knowledge, accidentally or unintentionally raise the environmental problem. For instance, in 2016, Quat Ninh beach in Nam Dinh recorded a mass number of international visitors; however, instead of keeping the beach hygienic, they left a bunch of trash on the sand, which is then removed by the local. This inconsiderate action leads to the negative opinion of national residents about international tourism. In short, the main reasons for the inhospitality of some people is that the worry about pandemic and the unawareness of tourists.
However, there are some possible solutions to address change the way local people view the international ones. Individually, every visitor, before approaching a country, should take their Covid-19 tested and learn about the culture and rule of that country in order to avoid unpleasant misunderstandings. They should raise their awareness and the respect for local people, the most important action is to keep the environment hygienic. For governments, they should impose regulations on traveling and activities that contribute to environmental deterioration. Step by step, as the awareness of the visitors towards the country is raised, the local will change their negative attitudes.
In conclusion, under certain cercumstances, it is reasonable for the local to have a negative eye on the non-domestic visitors. However, it is not difficult to change their attitudes, as long as the visitors are aware of their harmful activities and the governments take actions on certain conditions.
- The bar graph below illustrates the statistics of imprisonment in five different countries from 1930 to 1980 78
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- People are living longer Some people think that it causes big problems Others however think the aging population has many advantages for business government and for society in general Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals while others think that it is important to protect some not all of them Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...atic factor for the nation. There are a host of factors attributed to this idea as w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, second, so, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, in short, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51466666667 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18979929706 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514666666667 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8763950531 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.647058824 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0588235294 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27936125158 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867506294839 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472578819346 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163252605605 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254208441843 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.