Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that technology revolution has brought a number of counter-effects, including environmental problems. Some people advocate the idea of minimal lifestyle to address this issue, while others tend to rely on technology. Despite some obvious benefits of technology, I believe that we should not forget the central role humans play in this situation.
On the one hand, the advances in technology reflects the developing progress of the world, hence the reliance of some people on scientists for the solution of environmental problems. Undoubtedly, various inventions have been ebtablished and displayed considerate effects on this issue. However, as the technology develops, the amount of environment pollutant rise as well. Therefore, it is illogical for some people to see technology as a solution to the problems.
On the other hand, humans should take responsibilities for this situation as well. The best and most immediate solution for this issue is to change our lifestyle nowadays. People should get used to simpler lives like our predators lived, a world without air conditioners or cars, additionally, the main way of transportation should be public transports like buses or trains. This is due to fact that those inventions of technology are not only unnecessary, but also not eco-friendly as they release an enormous amount of exhaust. In addition, living simpler lives results in a reduction in humans’ needs, which leads to a drop in production. Therefore, less factory pollutants are exhaled into the environment. In short, the situation would be improved so much if people are used to living simpler lives.
In conclusion, some public commentators are too daydreaming to consider technology as a way to solve environmental problems. In order to address this issue, changing our livestyles to a minimal one is an absolute must.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-27 | Bao Ngoc Tho | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | baokhuyen759 | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | lehonganh1212 | 89 | view |
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred 67
- In many countries governments are spending a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 73
- The line charts illustrate population trends globally by percentage from 1950 to 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram details the process of making clothes from plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... a way to solve environmental problems. In order to address this issue, changing o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in short, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37671232877 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19590831953 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558219178082 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7246413558 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.125 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244736267505 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770493806788 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541007112797 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147551067264 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012833366175 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.