Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Essay topics:

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Nowadays, while many people argue that the governments should be responsible for conducting and supervising scientific research, other ones suppose that private companies can take it well. In my point of view, I strongly agree with the former opinion.

In term of letting the private companies in charge of doing scientific study, it can lead to a lots of serious consequences. First of all, it is clearly seen that the first thing private companies care is profit. Therefore, to maximize profit, they do not care about negative effects the scientific research brings, which may cause harm to the environment or even human beings. Secondly, having no supervising from the government, private company can take advantage of scientific research to create illegal products. For example, chemical poisonous or genetically modified animals.

On the other side of a coin, if the scientific research is under governments' control, it is certainly shared widely due to the aim of providing latest knowledge for community of the governments. From that point, every citizen is able to access the study and even apply it in life, or agricultural for instance. Moreover, when the governments carry out the scientific research, they will need support from the university. That gives students chance to engage in practical research. From that, enhance those students’ potential and passion in science.

To sum up, the responsibility of carrying and controlling scientific study is more suitable with the governments than private company due to lots of benefits it brings. So, private companies should cooperate with the government rather than doing study separately.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-18 Bunheehee98 84 view
2019-05-09 ludovicag 56 view
2019-03-25 ntmthuy 73 view
2018-06-11 Dthphuong 89 view
Essays by user ntmthuy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
... doing scientific study, it can lead to a lots of serious consequences. First of all, ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'providing the latest'.
Suggestion: providing the latest
...rtainly shared widely due to the aim of providing latest knowledge for community of the governme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43629343629 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95471503383 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4351410344 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.571428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307892977617 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985277968508 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808201259254 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195501084253 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741547698313 0.056905535591 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.