Many people believe that social networkingsites such as Facebook have had a hugenegative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree

People's opinions diverge on the Facebook, Twist, and Instagram adverse impact. Whilst I agree that social networks have had a positive impact on individuals, for the community, it could be problematic.
It is understandable why it is disadvantageous for the community. Firstly, it has been a great place for fraud offenses. Because of the private policy of Facebook and other social networks, crimes have been easy to make a close group and commit a crime like buying and selling organs, whereas police have met a lot of difficulties in arresting them. Secondly, it has made a chance for some people to spreading hearsay. By way of illustration, in Vietnam, during the Covid pandemic, several people have spread fake news about the number of death. Therefore, it has led to confusion and a loss of people's confidence in bureaucracy.
Despite the aforementioned valid reasons, I still believe that the favorable impact on individuals is more clear. First, Facebook, Twist, and Instagram have entitled people to express their emotions about everything around them. Therefore, it has helped them decline the risk of depression or pressure about work or study. Second, social networks have created greater employment possibilities for a number of people. For instance, through posts of an enterprise needing labor recruitment on Facebook, many workers have been more likely to have a job. Therefore, it has helped them have the financial ability in order to cater to their life. Third, through sites like Facebook, the disabled or the impoverished have received looking after and assistance about financial from more people in the world as a whole.
In conclusion, while there are a number of adverse impacts of social networks on society, I do believe that the benefit of those individuals clear in comparison with the disadvantage.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22033898305 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95043027065 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572881355932 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5675580183 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.25 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260588745902 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793119469978 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551551342457 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171106152472 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456781746949 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.