People hold different conflicting views about whether the lack of accommodation should be solved only by the authorities or not. While a number of people believe that it can also be tackled by other factors, I would argue that it can be better if the solution for housing shortage is offered by the government.
There are several compelling reasons why only the government can best deal with this issue. Firstly, it has a direct influence on economic growth because homeless people tend to have difficulty in getting jobs. For example, enterprises do not want to hire homeless people, so these people, to survive, they have to become criminals, robbers and it brings a detrimental impact to society and resident's lives. It is obvious that this abundant workforce can be utilized extremely well; however, there is no company that wants to employ them. Thus, it can result in the lack of workforce shortage and foreign investment. Secondly, in my opinion, the majority reason comes from the aging population. Nursing homes are being established more and more to serve the requirement of retirement; therefore, there is not enough housing area for people who are in working age.
Therefore, I firmly hold the view that this issue should be tackled only by the government. It can be explained that while residents can spend their money to purchase houses for the underprivileged and homeless people, some deep problems such as aging population and criminals still remain unchanged. From my perspective, people should get to the root of the matter, so the authorities who are experts in the labor market can step in to solve it the most suitably. For instance, in some developed countries where housing policy is pretty tight, houses are reasonably priced, so almost all citizens can afford to purchase their accommodation. Several solutions such as tax adjustment, increasing retirement age or attracting foreign workforce,.... can be adopted to address this problem and political leaders are the most suitable people to control it properly.
In conclusion, while many people think that individuals and some organizations can deal with housing shortage, I still believe that the best method should be offered by the government.
- The bar charts illustrate the average house expenses in England and its capital city London and to present the comparison regarding the average house prices between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 11
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 73
- There are severe social consequences of housing shortages in cities and only the government can solve these problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Youth drug abuse is a serous problem What are the possible causes of this behavior Do you have any suggestion to control that 56
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... root of the matter, so the authorities who are experts in the labor market can step in...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 741, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ment age or attracting foreign workforce,.... can be adopted to address this probl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16897506925 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85407833706 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548476454294 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8678474355 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179580643649 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607873354977 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400100054656 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110523701447 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336357540854 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.