People hold conflicting views about whether a lack of housing status in an urban area can be tackled solely by the government or by other institutions and even by each individual. While a number of people believe that this issue can be addressed by only the government, I would argue that this issue can be dealt with by a joint effort of the government, other institutions, and each individual.
On the one hand, there are various compelling reasons why solely the government can tackle this problem. Firstly, this is a company which has a high reliability. As a result, inhabitants are easy to follow their advice. Secondly, because of country management, they are the ones who make the rules. So they can adjust the regulations for real circumstances.
On the other hand, I firmly hold the view that this pressing should be dealt with by a joint effort of the government, other organizations, and each person. To prove this view, I will use several examples. First, when the government connects with schools and charity associations that will create more scholarships and grants for poor students. As a consequence, poor students can raise awareness of the rising population and do family planning early. This leads to a drop in housing shortages. Second, when the government, along with residents against natural disasters, the loss of property will decrease. If only the government, the loss will certainly be more.
In conclusion, while many people think that only the government can address a lack of housing status, I still believe that this alarming can be dealt with by a joint effort of the government, other institutions, and each individual.
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 73
- Youth drug abuse is a serous problem What are the possible causes of this behavior Do you have any suggestion to control that 56
- The bar charts illustrate the average house expenses in England and its capital city London and to present the comparison regarding the average house prices between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 11
- There are severe social consequences of housing shortages in cities and only the government can solve these problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- There are severe social consequences of housing shortages in cities and only the government can solve these problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02909090909 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93194657929 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2504402935 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127755181249 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458088476663 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403432739067 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905741901189 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214548486949 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02909090909 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93194657929 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2504402935 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127755181249 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458088476663 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403432739067 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905741901189 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214548486949 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.