Many people prefer to communicate with their online friends than to socialise with people in their local communities Do you think it s has more advantages or disadvantages

Gone are days when people used to make friends offline and preferred to have more physical interaction while talking. In contrary, Meeting and talking to masses on social media applications is quite popular trend among homo sapiens worldwide. In my opinion, demerits of this vogue overshadow its merits.

There are multifarious reasons to oppose trend of folks to socialize via internet. One most prominent cause is short lived friendships. In other words, although technology has blessed mankind with various amenities, but making friends on social sites leads to short term relations. This is because no physical attachment seems like weak thread which binds two person in a relation. As a result, this kind of relationships needs a small even useless reason to break the thread of friendship.

Another major reason can be scams which are very common these days. In addition to this, socialization through networks can be a way of some greedy minds to fool innocent people for the sake of earning money. Due to this, these scammers usually find their prey and try to the trust of person first. They frurther get person details of that person and misuse it. Consequently, in some cases victims have to commit suicide For instances, many such cases can be easily seen on newspaper headlines when cyber criminals hacks someone personal data and get money from one's account illegally.

Despite above mentioned drawbacks of modern way to commutation, one advantage of this trend is this allows individuals to broadens their horizons of knowledge by connecting to people all over world through world wide web. Owing to this, exchange of information is possible because most of people around the globe have access to internet.Hence, they are able to share their ideas and grab more knowledge. Conversely, this online interaction still cannot beat the information that humans can share by face-to-face conversation.

To conclude, it seems to me that social networks is a treasure of information in many fields, but in terms of communication most favourable medium must be face-to-face conversation due to advantages it offers.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... interaction while tasking. In contrary, Meeting and talking to masses on social ...
^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
... seems like weak thread which binds two person in a relation. As a result, this kind o...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...omeone personal data and get money from ones account illegally. Despite above men...
^^^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...ange of information is possible because most of people around the globe have access to interne...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...round the globe have access to internet.Hence, they are able to share their ideas and...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, kind of, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18711656442 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77385601016 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641104294479 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2766603487 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6875 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146730198549 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390980933606 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474238155681 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764556347816 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377289541089 0.056905535591 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.