One of the major controversial issue today relates to the excessive consumption of water. Some people assume it is their right to utilise as much water as they want. Others advocate that authorities are required to monitor the domestic and commercial usage of water strictly. I would examine both point of views in further segments before reaching to a final conclusion.
To commence with, there are two prime reasons why individuals consume water excessively. Firstly, there is lack of awareness among folks about value of water. In other words, people do not know the fact that water is on extinction. Due to this, masses continue to exceed the limits of water usage. As a result, it seems that earth will soon run out of this most precious natural resource. Secondly, modern lifestyle encourages individuals to consume more water than they really need. This is because many machines which are domestically used require large amount water such as washing machines, dish washer and so forth. As a result, human beings are utilizing the most valuable resource without even thinking that survival of them and their coming generation totally depends of this.
On the flip side, few masses support the idea that governing bodies should regulate the utilisation of water due to various reasons. One of them is government has authority to aware people about adverse effects which can be experienced by mankind and mother earth due to over usage of water. This can be done through awareness campaigns. Hence, impulsive water users would realise that they are doing something wrong for planet. Another factor is that authorities can make distribution plan of water supply and people can be motivated to recycle domestic used water for irrigation purpose. Consequently, people will have to adjust with amount of water they will be allowed to use, and they could be able to save water.
To sum up, it seems to me that equal contribution of governing bodies and humans can curtail the issue of water usage and can help water comsumers to stop crossing their limits.
- The length of the working week does not reflect modern lifestyle needs It should be substantially reduced to give people more leisure time and time with their families How far do you agree with this statement 84
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- Despite the environmental concerns raised by scientists people are not changing their lifestyle Why so What should be done to encourage the people in order to save environment 89
- It is better to learn the way people lived in the past through films and video records than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many young people today choose or are forced to go and work abroad What are the advantages disadvantages of living and working in a foreign country compared with living and working in your own country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, such as, as a result, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03801169591 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55523603928 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590643274854 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1759312122 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6842105263 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256221768967 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779378152789 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696396633364 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149900704095 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609461008917 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.